 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Chen v. Gonzales, No. 05-1561,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review was denied where alien waived argument concerning the denial of his request for relief for withholding of removal and protection under CAT because he did not raise it on appeal to BIA, and alien's challenge to the denial of his application for asylum failed because substantial evidence supported IJ's credibility finding.
|
|||||
| Doe v. Chao, No. 05-1068,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorneys' fee award was vacated and remanded in part under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.S. § 552a(g)(4), on finding the district court failed to determine the reasonableness of plaintiff's attorneys' fee award in light of the fact that plaintiff recovered no actual damages.
|
|||||
| Edwards v. Stansberry, No. 05-6951,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Farmer v. Hayden, No. 05-2185,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fed. Ins. Co. v. Ward, No. 04-2004,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment in favor of insured company's employees was reversed in insurer's subrogation claim on finding that, as a matter of law, the employees were not insured when they flicked ashes into a trash can, because under Virginia law, that act was neither within the "scope" of their employment, nor in performance of a job-related duty.
|
|||||
| Felder v. Lamanna, No. 05-6577,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gouge v. Penn Am. Ins. Co., No. 05-1907,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Graham v. Md. Judiciary Sys., No. 05-7072,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Davis, No. 05-5204,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
