 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Richardson v. A. A. Podiatry, P.L.L.C., No. 05-2277,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Richardson v. Foster, No. 05-2276,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rodriguez v. Pereira, No. 05-2163,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Antley, No. 05-6875,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Bennett, No. 05-6937,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Campos, No. 04-4988,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted for possession of a controlled substance under a New Jersey statute with a maximum sentence of 18 months in prison, this was a "prior conviction for a felony drug offense" within meaning of 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(b)(1)(A). That defendant was sentenced to less than one year in prison for New Jersey conviction was immaterial.
|
|||||
| United States v. Cox, No. 05-4384,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed where district court did not clearly err in determining that defendant possessed a firearm in connection with another felony, USSG § 2K2.1(b)(5), because both his victim and her daughter confirmed that he used firearm to threaten victim, and his sentence was within statutorily prescribed range and was reasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Green, No. 05-4223,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 97-month sentence for selling crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B) was affirmed since the sentence was not imposed in violation of the Sixth Amendment as it was within the statutory range, and a series of drug transactions was relevant conduct for purposes of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.3(a)(2).
|
|||||
| United States v. Guzman-Balbuena, No. 05-4184,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction and sentence were affirmed where the district court imposed a sentence within the advisory guideline range and below the statutory maximum for the offense and considered the relevant factors under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553, and defendant identified no persuasive reason why the sentence imposed was not reasonable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
