 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Gomez, No. 05-7223,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Haston, No. 05-4485,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court's judgment was affirmed. Defendant's sentence was not only within advisory guideline range, but also well below statutory maximum. Furthermore, sentence was reasonable as district court appropriately treated USSG as advisory, calculated and considered guideline range, and weighed the relevant 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors.
|
|||||
| United States v. Lundy, No. 04-5016,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court did not err in finding that the search warrant was supported by probable cause. The confidential informant (CI) had provided reliable information to the DEA agent before witnessing defendant's criminal activity. Moreover, the Sheriff's Department was able to corroborate all of the timely and specific details provided by the CI.
|
|||||
| United States v. Martinez-Flores, No. 05-4673,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was not only within the USSG range, but also well below the statutory maximum of ten years for each count. The sentence imposed by the district court was reasonable as it appropriately treated the guidelines as advisory, calculated and considered the guideline range, and weighed the relevant 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors.
|
|||||
| United States v. McLean, No. 05-7281,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. O'Dell, No. 05-4440,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Porter, No. 05-7268,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Rolle, No. 05-7554,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Smith, No. 05-4395,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Four-to-ten month range for defendant's sentence recommended by U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a) was not binding on district court. The imposition of a twenty-four month sentence upon the revocation of defendant's supervised release was reasonable where defendant had received a significant downward departure from his original sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
