 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Collier v. Charlottesville Sch. Bd., No. 06-1396,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former employer was properly granted summary judgment in a former employee's employment discrimination and retaliatory discharge suit. The employee failed to rebut the legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for his transfer and termination, particularly his poor work habits, attitude, and work ethic, and his repeated absences from the work site.
|
|||||
| In re Henderson, No. 06-5227,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mayor & City Council v. Lee, No. 06-1701,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Brown, No. 06-7114,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Galloway, No. 06-4419,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court imposed a sentence of 360 months' imprisonment, which was within the appropriately calculated advisory guideline range of 360 months' to life imprisonment and was therefore presumptively reasonable. There was no evidence in the record that the sentence was procedurally or substantively unreasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Jacobs, No. 04-5075,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions were affirmed but his sentence vacated. As the Government conceded, the district court sentenced defendant under the mandatory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual and enhanced his sentence based on facts not found by jury beyond a reasonable doubt or admitted by defendant. This error affected defendant's substantial rights.
|
|||||
| United States v. Johnson, No. 06-4267,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's supervised release was properly revoked under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 7B1.3 because he was convicted of a new crime, which was a Grade B offense, and he admitted to three other release violations. A 24-month sentence was upheld because it was within the sentencing range, based on defendant's recidivism, and was not unreasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. McAllister, No. 06-4800,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under 18 U.S.C.S. § 5G1.3(c), a statutory mandatory minimum sentence of 120 months, which was imposed upon a guilty plea of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 grams of heroin, was properly ordered to run consecutively with a sentence imposed upon the revocation of defendant's supervised release for a prior offense.
|
|||||
| United States v. Morrow, No. 06-4483,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was both within the USSG range of 100 to 125 months, and within the statutory maximum of ten years imprisonment. As district court appropriately treated the guidelines as advisory, and properly calculated and considered the guideline range and the relevant 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors, the sentence was reasonable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
