 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Epps, No. 05-6275,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Gartrell, No. 05-6830,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Matthews, No. 04-5094,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While district court clearly erred in sentencing defendant under the mandatory USSG scheme, any error was harmless because, while district court could have given defendant a lower sentence, even under the mandatory scheme, it chose not to, and district court explicitly noted that, even if USSG were advisory, it would have imposed the same sentence.
|
|||||
| United States v. McDaniels, No. 05-4796,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 46-month sentence for possession of a firearm under advisory guidelines was reasonable because the district court properly calculated the guideline range, sentenced him only after considering the guidelines and the factors in 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a), and clearly stated that it deemed the sentence appropriate under the circumstances.
|
|||||
| United States v. Miles, No. 05-4723,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court did not err in declining to adjust the offense level downward under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1(a) (2004) after concluding that defendant's continued use of marijuana demonstrated that he had not accepted responsibility for his criminal conduct.
|
|||||
| United States v. Young, No. 05-6393,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Warch v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., No. 04-2354,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former employer was properly granted Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) summary judgment in a former employee's Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.S. § 623(a)(1), suit. There was no genuine issue of material fact that the employee did not meet job expectations, was not replaced by a younger employee, or that age was not a factor in the termination.
|
|||||
| Washington v. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No. 05-1749,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
