 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Baham, No. 06-4443,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A variance sentence two levels above an advisory guidelines range was unreasonable because the district court did not explain why the variance sentence better served sentencing objectives, did not consider a departure under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, and did not consider a sentence within the range immediately above the advisory range.
|
|||||
| United States v. Griffin, No. 06-6776,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Moreno, No. 06-7631,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Morris, No. 06-7672,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Persaud, No. 06-7519,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Rose, No. 06-4160,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed as district court fully complied with appellate court's post-Booker sentencing analysis and district court acted reasonably with respect to the imposition of a variance and its extent. Defendant's conviction under 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 922(g), 924(e) was affirmed as jury's verdict was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Shelton, No. 06-7390,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Smith, No. 06-4464,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's girlfriend responded to an officer's inquiry by stating that guns were located in a closet, defendant's statement that everything was his was voluntary for purposes of the Fifth Amendment because the officer could not have foreseen that his exchange with the girlfriend would have prompted an incriminating response from defendant.
|
|||||
| United States v. Spruill, No. 06-7461,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
