 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hong Lin v. Gonzales, No. 05-1856,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| R.M.S. Titanic, Inc. v. Wrecked & Abandoned Vessel, No. 04-1933,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court remanded the case to the district court with the recognition that it may apply the principles of traditional salvage law to the wreck of the Titanic in a manner that served either the owner or, absent an owner, the public interest and at the same time provided an appropriate award to the salvor.
|
|||||
| Tsafah v. Gonzales, No. 05-1600,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Everett, No. 05-4696,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Hames, No. 04-4368,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was vacated and remanded for resentencing where district court committed plain error in sentencing defendant because defendant's 70-month sentence exceeded the maximum authorized by the facts found by the jury, in violation of Sixth Amendment. Defendant's conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon was affirmed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Harris, No. 05-7106,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Meaders, No. 05-4593,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Price, No. 05-4426,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reasonable jury could have determined that defendant knowingly possessed firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g)(1), where he was the only person in vehicle, gun was found next to him under passenger seat, and he accelerated through well-marked police checkpoint, stopping after officers gave chase. Driver's license checkpoint was reasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Riddick, No. 05-7337,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
