 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Diaz-Calderon, No. 05-4967; No. 05-4976; No. 05-4978; No. 05-4992; No. 05-5055; No. 05-5059; No. 05-5074,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported defendants' convictions under 21 U.S.C.S §§ 952(a), 963, 841(a)(1), which arose out of a conspiracy to import cocaine, where there was substantial evidence to prove that cocaine was imported from Guatemala. There was also sufficient evidence that each defendant knowingly entered conspiracy or was willfully blind to it.
|
|||||
| United States v. Miller, No. 06-7757,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Oriakhi, No. 06-7886,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Utley, No. 05-5097,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. White, No. 03-4920,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No Sixth Amendment error occurred when a district court imposed an Armed Career Criminal Act enhancement as the district court was not called upon to resolve any disputed issues of fact regarding defendant's prior convictions because defendant acknowledged at sentencing that he had at least four prior convictions qualifying him for the enhancement.
|
|||||
| Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Potomac Inv. Props., Inc., No. 06-1187,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A transit authority was properly granted summary judgment in its suit for a declaratory judgment that a right of first refusal agreement with an investment company was fully performed and no longer in force because the agreement was completed when the company exercised its option to lease the property, even though it eventually cancelled the lease.
|
|||||
| Westberry v. Behrmann, No. 06-8005,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Westberry v. Riley, No. 06-7979,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
