 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Black & Decker Corp. v. United States, No. 05-1015,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was denied in a tax refund dispute because 26 U.S.C.S. §§ 357 and 358 did not require a taxpayer corporation to reduce its basis in its corporate subsidiary's stock by the amount of the liabilities it transferred to the subsidiary, and genuine issues of material fact were disputed under a sham transaction doctrine analysis.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Ohar, No. 05-7432,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Entsminger v. Va. Dep't of Corr., No. 05-7418,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jeter v. Rushton, No. 05-7361,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Moes v. DeWalt, No. 05-7429,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Morris v. Wendt, No. 05-7421,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pollard v. United States, No. 05-1304,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because it was uncontested that decedent's physician was an employee of the U.S. (and that the claims against the U.S. premised upon his conduct therefore fell within the scope of the FTCA's waiver of sovereign immunity), it was error for the district court to dismiss plaintiff's medical malpractice claims against the U.S. for want of jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Riley v. McMaster, No. 05-7379,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Short v. Smoot, No. 05-1284,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: First-shift jail officers were not deliberately indifferent under U.S. Const. amend. VIII to the risk that a jailed decedent would kill himself because, in response to the decedent's suicide risk, the officers placed the decedent in a cell under video surveillance, regardless of whether additional precautions might also have been advisable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
