 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cooper v. Gonzales, No. 05-1526,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien was properly found to be inadmissible under 8 U.S.C.S. §§ 1182(a)(6)(C), (7)(A) because he was alien seeking admission under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(13)(C)(ii) as he had been absent from US continuously for more than 180 days, and he did not possess valid immigrant visa and made willful and material misrepresentations to obtain admission.
|
|||||
| Gaylor v. Coleman, No. 06-6547; No. 06-7106,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers' Comp. Programs, No. 05-2406,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee was properly awarded attorney's fees under 33 U.S.C.S. § 928(b) because a controversy had developed over his amount of compensation, certain communications served as the functional equivalent of an informal conference, and the employee ultimately obtained a greater award than he was able to achieve prior to litigating his case.
|
|||||
| Perkins v. Town of Princeville, No. 06-1501,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sy v. Gonzales, No. 06-1564,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Douglas, No. 05-4506,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Dumas, No. 05-4788,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence to sustain defendant's conviction under 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(c) for possession of a firearm in relation to drug trafficking crime. Contrary to defendant's contention that gun was merely present in room with drugs, illegal gun was located near cocaine and cash, and other indicia of drug trafficking were found in the room.
|
|||||
| United States v. Hadden, No. 03-7508,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though defendant did not obtain a certificate of appealability, the court, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C.S. § 1291, had jurisdiction over defendant's appeal from a § 2255 order that corrected defendant's sentence, because the appealed order was a hybrid order and defendant appealed only the aspect that was criminal in nature.
|
|||||
| United States v. Jackson, No. 06-4556,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence imposed upon defendant's resentencing was affirmed because district court appropriately treated guidelines as advisory and properly calculated and considered advisory guideline range and relevant statutory factors, and defendant's assertions on appeal failed to overcome presumption of reasonableness that applied to his guidelines sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
