 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Boone v. United States Atty., No. 06-1515,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Christopher Phelps & Assocs., LLC v. Galloway, No. 05-2266,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court could not issue permanent injunction prohibiting plaintiff from leasing or selling house. Not only would injunction unduly restrain alienation of real property, it would violate first sale doctrine in 17 U.S.C.S. § 109(a), which authorized plaintiff to sell or dispose of house as copy for which remedies in copyright action were paid.
|
|||||
| Mekonen v. Gonzales, No. 06-1357,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Palgunadi v. Gonzales, No. 06-1666,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Santos-Soto v. Gonzales, No. 06-1692,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported the ruling that the alien failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution as necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. Moreover, as the alien could not sustain her burden on the asylum claim, she could not establish her entitlement to withholding of removal.
|
|||||
| Tisdale v. Beck, No. 06-7891,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Barajas, No. 06-7236,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Coleman, No. 06-7318,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Tapia, No. 06-7429,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
