 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brockman v. Snow, No. 06-1004,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A government employee's Title VII discrimination and retaliation claims against her employer were properly dismissed because she could not show that the employer's denial of her request to work from home during her prescribed pregnancy-related bed rest was an adverse employment action; the employer did offer to approve sick leave for the employee.
|
|||||
| Integrated Elec. Servs. v. NLRB, No. 05-2289; No. 05-2411,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because substantial evidence supported the NLRB's conclusion that an employer engaged in unfair labor practices in violation of the NLRA and the employer was motivated by anti-union animus when it terminated an employee, a court granted the NLRB's petition for enforcement of its order requiring the employee's reinstatement.
|
|||||
| Jeffress v. Barnhart, No. 06-1708,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Maxwell v. DAK Ams., No. 06-1068,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Monyei v. Gonzales, No. 06-1718,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Peeples v. Johnson, No. 06-7073,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sloan v. Johnson, No. 06-7421,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Britt, No. 04-4313,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for various drug and firearm offenses were affirmed, but his sentence was vacated. It was undisputed that the jury did not find the facts necessary to support each enhancement and defendant's counsel's statement that unspecified objections to the presentence report were resolved could not be construed as an admission.
|
|||||
| Wilkins v. Clary, No. 05-1921,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
