 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Moog, Inc. v. Lunin, No. 06-1661,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Edwards, No. 06-4802,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction and sentence were affirmed as a district court fully complied with the mandate of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 in accepting defendant's guilty plea. The appellate court declined to review defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal as his counsel's alleged ineffectiveness was not apparent from the record.
|
|||||
| United States v. Gonzalez-Camacho, No. 06-4329,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed. District court sentenced defendant to 15 months; because the sentence did not exceed the maximum authorized by the facts charged in the indictment and admitted by defendant, defendant's Sixth Amendment rights were not violated.
|
|||||
| United States v. Love, No. 06-4485,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant, who pleaded guilty to a drug offense, was properly sentenced to a 97 month term. A district court did not err in failing to sua sponte depart under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1 based on defendant's assistance to the government, and there was no showing of an unconstitutional motive in the government's withholding a motion.
|
|||||
| Vaughan v. Recall Total Info. Mgmt., No. 05-1491,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of buyers' equitable recoupment counterclaim was reversed and counterclaim was remanded to district court as claim could have been considered a compulsory counterclaim, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 13(a), as accurate calculation of earnout under stock purchase agreement was at heart of sellers' breach of contract action as well as counterclaim.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
