 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Balt. Sun Co. v. Ehrlich, No. 05-1297,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the Governor's directive not to speak with the publisher's reporter or columnist neither communicated a threat to the publisher, nor divulged private information in its function as an internal directive, it did not give rise to an actionable claim for retaliation under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
|
|||||
| Kasoka v. Gonzales, No. 05-1823,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Morcos v. Gonzales, No. 05-1743,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An alien's petition for review of the decision denying his application for asylum was denied where the evidence was not so compelling as to warrant reversal, under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B). With respect to the alien's motion to remand, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.
|
|||||
| Ohio Valley Envtl. Coalition v. Bulen, No. 04-2129 (L),
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Shepherd v. Evans, No. 05-1939,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Thorn v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Ins. Co., No. 05-1162,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court of appeals affirmed district court's judgment finding that class certification was not appropriate under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 in case filed by insureds who claimed insurance companies violated 42 U.S.C.S. §§ 1981 and 1982 when they charged African-Americans higher premiums for industrial life insurance policies they sold between 1911 and 1973.
|
|||||
| United States v. Bennett, No. 05-4427,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Brown, No. 05-4952,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's sentence fell within range calculated under advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual and below statutory maximum for his firearms offense, set by 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(a)(2), and nothing in record revealed that trial court did not properly consider relevant factors under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a), court affirmed defendant's sentence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Cruz, No. 05-4807,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant possessed in his car both a gun and counterfeit currency, the district court did not err by impliedly finding that defendant possessed the gun to protect himself and his properly, including the counterfeit currency, and thus a sentence enhancement for his weapons offense, a violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g)(5)(A), was proper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
