LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 4th Circuit Court of Appeals - February 21, 2007

  
United States v. Murray, No. 05-4836, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's convictions were affirmed as the evidence at trial was sufficient to support jury's verdict, which convicted defendant of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base and of possession with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine base, under 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), (b)(1)(C), 846.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Alexander, No. 06-7072, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Amaker, No. 05-5111, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Blackwell, No. 06-4966, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Cepeda, No. 06-6788, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Conley, No. 06-7182, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Gallegos, No. 06-4545, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine was properly sentenced to 100 months of imprisonment because the sentencing court properly considered the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual range, the relevant factors under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a), and Booker.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Gardner, No. 06-6763, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Hastings, No. 06-7159, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Hodges, No. 06-4002, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Court affirmed defendant's conviction on weapons charges where district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to order government to divulge identity of a confidential information whose information formed basis for search warrant of defendant's home; defendant did not meet burden of proving that he was entitled to know informant's identity.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.