 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Glass v. Young, No. 05-7609,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hamm-Bey v. Johnson, No. 05-7298,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hogue v. Johnson, No. 05-7471,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Roche v. Bledsoe, No. 05-7591,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Bowens, No. 05-7365,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A certificate of appealability was denied under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253(c) and defendant's appeal from the denial of his 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 motion was dismissed where he failed to show that reasonable jurists would have found that district court's assessment of his constitutional claims and any dispositive procedural rulings were debatable or wrong.
|
|||||
| United States v. Christian, No. 04-4986,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court said that sentence it imposed was at low end of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and was the least it could give under the law. As this statement could provide a nonspeculative basis for concluding that its treatment of the Guidelines as mandatory affected the selection of the sentence it imposed, under Booker, defendant had to be resentenced.
|
|||||
| United States v. Ellerbe, No. 05-7644,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Freeman, No. 05-7368,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Garries, No. 05-7417,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
