 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Awejia v. Gonzales, No. 05-1730,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for review was denied. Because alien failed to show that she was eligible for asylum, she could not meet higher standard for withholding of removal. Substantial evidence supported finding that alien failed to meet standard for relief under Convention Against Torture as alien failed to make requisite showing before the immigration court.
|
|||||
| In re Burnham, No. 05-7140,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Mendez, No. 06-6050,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Modeba v. Gonzales, No. 04-2454,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed the BIA's denial of the alien's motion to reopen because while the evidence the alien provided in support of his motion to reopen was clearly material, the alien failed to establish that the evidence was unavailable and not capable of being discovered or presented at his asylum hearing.
|
|||||
| Terry v. Johnson, No. 06-6024,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Buckner, No. 05-7874,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Foreman, No. 05-7872,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Jones, No. 05-7965,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. McCrorey, No. 05-7854,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant had not made the requisite showing for a COA under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253 since defendant had not demonstrated that reasonable jurists would have found that the district court's assessment of his constitutional claims was debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court were also debatable or wrong.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
