 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Furgess v. UPS, No. 06-2272,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gallipeau v. Myspace.com, No. 06-2319,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ikete v. Gonzales, No. 05-2326,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review of denial of requests for asylum and withholding of removal was denied as substantial evidence supported IJ's adverse credibility finding and ruling that alien failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution as necessary to establish eligibility for asylum, under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a).
|
|||||
| Kidd v. Washington, No. 05-7989,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McLaughlin v. Principi, No. 06-2283,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ripley v. Robinson, No. 05-7103,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Certificate of appealability was denied, under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253(c), and prisoner's appeal from dismissal of successive 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 petition was dismissed as he failed to show that reasonable jurists would have found that any assessment of constitutional claims and any dispositive procedural ruling by district court were debatable or wrong.
|
|||||
| Stultz v. Ponder, No. 06-1589,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Turner v. Bush, No. 06-2007,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Baird, No. 06-4801,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed defendant's sentence, which did not depart below career offender guideline range, where district court properly could not discern any reason not to apply the career offender provisions or to apply a sentence outside of the guideline range.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
