 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Santos, No. 05-4606,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence was affirmed, where the district court sentenced defendant below his properly calculated guideline sentencing range. The court considered the factors in 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) and explained its reasons for imposing a sentence below the guidelines range in deciding his sentence; defendant's sentence was not unreasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Twitty, No. 03-4954,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence did not violate Booker because based solely on the career offender enhancement, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, the defendant's 240-month sentence did not exceed the maximum authorized by the facts that were properly established and not found by the district court, and therefore did not violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights.
|
|||||
| United States v. Waters, No. 05-7442,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Williams, No. 03-4776,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant failed to demonstrate that the plain error in sentencing him under a mandatory guideline scheme affected his substantial rights because the transcript contained no nonspeculative basis for concluding that the district court would have sentenced him to a lesser sentence had it proceeded under an advisory guideline regime.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Stewart, No. 05-7443,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wright v. Transp. Sec. Admin., No. 05-2157,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
