 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Giddens v. Johnson, No. 05-7612,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hargett v. Forsyth County Sheriff's Dep't, No. 05-7603,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Moore v. Buncombe County, No. 05-7611,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Norfolk Dredging Co. v. Wiley, No. 05-1331,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order dissolving injunction in maritime civil suit was affirmed because the claimant, an injured seaman, did not waive his right to move to dissolve federal court's injunction by filing motions for affirmative relief and by pursuing discovery in response to vessel owner's suit under the Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C.S. app. § 181 et seq.
|
|||||
| Osborne v. Murphy, No. 05-7623,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Nat'l Ctr. on Insts. & Alternatives, Inc., No. 05-1731,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where, based on its settlement of an administrative action, an insured knew it could be liable for the injuries a client sustained during a choking incident, under Maryland law, as a matter of law, a claims-made insurance policy the insured later obtained was void ab initio because the insured failed to disclose the choking incident to the insurer.
|
|||||
| United States v. Anderson, No. 05-7601,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Charley, No. 04-4245,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court did not commit clear error in applying the firearm enhancement, under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1, to defendant where it was undisputed that (1) defendant distributed cocaine base from her residence, and (2) in executing a search warrant, police recovered a firearm from defendant's residence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Fisher, No. 03-4259,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's case was remanded for resentencing where defendant's 235-month sentence on each count met the standard for plain error that had to be recognized because, if not for the amount of crack cocaine, a fact found by the district court, defendant's offense level would have resulted in a guidelines range of 15 to 21 months on each count.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
