LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 4th Circuit Court of Appeals - March 5, 2007

  
Harper v. Currituck County Clerk of Courts, No. 06-8033, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Carter, No. 06-7952, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Marshall, No. 06-6941, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re White, No. 07-6051, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lanham v. United States, No. 06-7819, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lettieri v. Equant, Inc., No. 05-1532, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: District court erred in failing to apply exception created in Miles, which relieved employee of burden to show replacement outside of her protected class as part of prima facie Title VII sex discrimination case. Employer's recurring retaliatory animus in seven-month period between employee's complaint and termination established causal link.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Long v. Hinkle, No. 05-7518, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Mba v. Gonzales, No. 06-1676, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An alien was not entitled to reversal of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision denying her applications for asylum under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158 and other relief because substantial evidence supported the adverse credibility finding and the ruling that the alien failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Anderson, No. 06-7867, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Berry, No. 05-6861, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's appeal from the denial of his § 2255 motion was dismissed as untimely because his statement in an attachment to his purported notice of appeal did not comport with Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and 28 U.S.C.S. § 1746; the statement was not notarized, it made no reference to the potential penalty for perjury, and it was not specifically dated.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.