 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Carpenter v. Carroll, No. 05-1800,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ex-wife did not have standing to bring a suit under ERISA where she was not a fiduciary, beneficiary, or participant in any ERISA plans, under 29 U.S.C.S. § 1132(a)(1)-(3). Ex-wife could not have standing as beneficiary because her ex-husband, the only plan participant through whom ex-wife could claim beneficiary status, was not deceased.
|
|||||
| Chawla v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins. Co., No. 05-1160,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurance company was properly granted summary judgment on a breach of insurance contract claim because the company was entitled to rescind the policy at issue because of misrepresentations in the life insurance applications (the insured did not disclose, among other things, a meningioma surgery, a shunt surgery, or three hospitalizations).
|
|||||
| Graham v. Ray, No. 05-7019,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Certificate of appealability was denied, under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253(c), and prisoner's appeal from order denying relief under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 was dismissed where prisoner failed to show that reasonable jurists would have found that district court's assessment of constitutional claims and any dispositive procedural rulings were debatable or wrong.
|
|||||
| Kamga v. Gonzales, No. 05-1674,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Milligan v. W&M Props., No. 05-2062,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Nagy v. Rogers, No. 05-7899,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pence v. Tenneco Auto. Operating Co., No. 05-1582,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly granted in favor of defendant employer on plaintiff's ADA claims because the employer's belief that plaintiff had made a death threat against co-workers was a permissible nondiscriminatory reason for his termination, even if the employer believed that a mental condition had caused plaintiff to make the threat.
|
|||||
| Seid v. Gonzales, No. 05-1795,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Jefferson, No. 05-4280,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
