 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Abbott, No. 06-4462,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence imposed on a defendant, who pleaded guilty to knowingly causing the delivery of a letter threatening to injure another person, was properly enhanced under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3A1.2(b) (2004) because the letter, which was directed to a secretary of state, was clearly motivated by the victim's status as a government official.
|
|||||
| United States v. Arey, No. 06-4634; No. 06-4635; No. 06-4636,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The evidence was sufficient to convict defendants of conspiring to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute under 21 U.S.C.S. § 846 because defendants' supplier testified that he sold large quantities of the drug to defendants over several years, and other witnesses testified to numerous purchases of methamphetamine from defendants.
|
|||||
| United States v. Miller, No. 05-5118,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court judge who was a U.S. Attorney while the FBI investigated defendant and who practiced in the same law firm where a former Assistant U.S. Attorney who had worked on defendant's case practiced was not required to recuse himself under 28 U.S.C.S. § 455(a) because the judge was not aware of defendant's case before he became a judge.
|
|||||
| United States v. Rattler, No. 05-5169,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was vacated and remanded for a proper calculation of USSG range and a reconsideration of whether a sentence within that range was consistent with 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors because district court's USSG calculation indicated that it erroneously believed it was bound by jury findings in determining proper advisory USSG range.
|
|||||
| United States v. Washington, No. 06-4948,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant argued on appeal that his offense level was enhanced in violation of the Sixth Amendment and that he should have received a reduction in his offense level, defendant's appeal was dismissed because defendant's waiver of his appellate rights was knowing and voluntary and the issues raised on appeal were within the scope of the waiver.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
