 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mills v. Sanders, No. 06-1536,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Parsons v. Wynne, No. 06-1876,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Federal employee's Title VII retaliation claim failed as, even under the Burlington standard, the employee was unable to establish a prima facie case of retaliation because neither her performance evaluation nor her removal from an alternate work schedule would have dissuaded a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.
|
|||||
| San Francisco Oven, LLC v. Fransmart, Inc., No. 06-1358,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorneys' fees to consultant, under 15 U.S.C.S. § 1117(a), as the record supported the findings by district court that franchisor brought Lanham Act claim solely to avoid a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and that it pursued this claim without any factual or legal support.
|
|||||
| Steiger v. Educational Credit Mgmt. Corp.(In re Steiger), No. 05-2100; No. 05-2107,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Jacobs, No. 06-4518,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Palmer, No. 05-4991,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where court, upon conducting reasonableness review pursuant to Booker, could not discern whether district court considered factors of 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) when sentencing defendant or whether it did so properly, sentence was vacated. On remand, district court had to provide an indication that it considered § 3553(a) factors and parties' arguments.
|
|||||
| United States v. Robinson, No. 06-4734,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Suthar, No. 06-4508,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction and sentence were affirmed. District court did not err in denying Fed. R. Crim. P. 29 motion as evidence was sufficient to establish defendant distributed chemicals used to manufacture methamphetamine. Defendant sold hydrogen peroxide and large quantities of matches to informant and agreed to try to secure Sudafed for him.
|
|||||
| United States v. Taft, No. 06-4231,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Allowing witness to testify did not violate Sixth Amendment as defendant offered no evidence that attorney's representation of both him and witness created actual conflict of interest. Overlapping representation lasted for brief period of time, during which neither individual was involved in same proceeding or implicated in same criminal conduct.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
