 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Billings v. Polk, No. 05-8,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate, who was convicted of murder, rape, and other charges, was properly denied 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 habeas corpus relief. Although a juror did not disclose prior contact with the prosecutor, the failure to volunteer this information was not a dishonest response or a deliberate omission of material information that violated the inmate's rights.
|
|||||
| Gregory v. Finova Capital Corp., No. 05-2118,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Class certification of note holders' suit for federal securities law violations against a lender of a bankrupt company was reversed. When compared to a pending bankruptcy adversary proceeding concerning the same issues, a class suit was not a superior method under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3)(B) for the fair and efficient adjudication of this matter.
|
|||||
| Gregory v. Finova Capital Corp., No. 05-2118,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Scinto v. Preston, No. 05-7071,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of diabetic pretrial detainee's § 1983 deliberate indifference claim was reversed on finding that although there was a lack of clarity as to how long the detainee was in custody, the district court incorrectly concluded that the detainee could prove no set of facts in support of his deliberate indifference claim.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Chao, No. 05-1893,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Brite, No. 05-4772,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a 24-month sentence upon the revocation of supervised release because the sentence was within the statutory maximum and defendant's continued drug use and failure to pay support constituted an appropriate factual basis for sentencing him to the high end of the advisory guidelines.
|
|||||
| United States v. Gilliam, No. 05-7446,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Grant, No. 05-4158,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Jones, No. 05-7465,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
