LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 4th Circuit Court of Appeals - March 15, 2006

  
Bezabeh v. Gonzales, No. 05-1697, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Woodberry, No. 05-7762, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jassiem v. Gonzales, No. 05-1251, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Cook, No. 05-7656, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Keitt, No. 05-4622, No. 05-4675, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's sentences were affirmed where the sentences were reasonable and the record did not reveal prosecutorial misconduct as to United States' failure to move for downward departure because United States declined to move for downward departure after defendant violated several of the conditions of his release on bond and his bond was revoked.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Lewis, No. 03-4112, No. 04-6660, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's bank robbery conviction was affirmed as there was no reason to doubt his competency, his knowing and voluntary guilty plea precluded his claims that he was actually innocent and was denied due process, and he had no right to counsel during a presentence interview. His sentence was also affirmed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. McNair, No. 05-4699, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Mungo, No. 04-4958, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed where there was no error in classifying him as an armed career criminal under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.4 and increasing his statutory minimum sentence to 15 years' imprisonment, and there was no error with application of USSG because defendant was sentenced to statutory minimum term of imprisonment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Sadler, No. 05-7005, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A certificate of appealability was denied, under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253(c), and defendant's appeal was dismissed where he failed to demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of his constitutional claims was debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings were also debatable or wrong.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.