 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brinkley v. Johnson, No. 05-6923,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Associated Press, No. 06-1301,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for writ of mandamus was granted as to documentary exhibits that were admitted into evidence and fully published to jury. While appellate court was sympathetic to district court's administrative burdens, it did not agree that incremental rise in burdens caused by providing access justified denial of access until after trial was completed.
|
|||||
| Kanawha Coal Co. v. Akers, No. 05-1594,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Gleaton, No. 05-7607,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Gutierrez-Piza, No. 05-4629,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was reasonable where (1) his 37 month sentence was both within the guideline range, and well within statutory maximum under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326(b)(2), and (2) district court appropriately treated the USSG as advisory, properly calculated and considered the guideline range, and weighed the relevant 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors.
|
|||||
| United States v. Washington, No. 05-4653,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Determination that defendant obstructed justice under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3C1.1 (2004) was affirmed where district court's determination that defendant knowingly based his defense on his wife's perjured testimony was not clearly erroneous and was sufficient to warrant the adjustment, and wife's testimony was central to his defense.
|
|||||
| Ward v. Maloney, No. 05-1994,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
