 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| 1335 Piccard LLC v. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, No. 05-1466,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because no provision of the policy issued by the insurer to the insured covered the loss of rental income caused by a sewer backup, the judgment entered in favor of the insurer was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Grandison v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. 05-6999,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Phull v. Interstate Mgmt. Co., LLC, No. 05-1829,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Hampton, No. 05-4224,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was vacated. Although district court briefly mentioned two 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors--deterrence and protection of public--in setting forth variance sentence, it never explained how sentence imposed--three years' probation rather than USSG range of 57 to 71 months' imprisonment--served these interests.
|
|||||
| United States v. Murphy, No. 05-7514,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Newsome, No. 04-4218,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction and sentence for pleading guilty to 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1) was affirmed because there was no error in the district court's application of the armed career criminal enhancement to defendant since his sentence did not exceed the maximum under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.4(b)(3)(B) range.
|
|||||
| United States v. Singleton, No. 04-4108,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions were affirmed but his sentence was vacated and case was remanded. Police reasonably relied in good faith upon properly obtained search warrant that specifically authorized no-knock search, but defendant's sentence of 188 months for drug-trafficking conviction exceeded maximum sentence authorized without judge-found facts.
|
|||||
| United States v. Smith, No. 04-7456,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
