 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Delbridge v. Dewalt, No. 05-7039,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lynch v. Galley, No. 05-7302,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Macon v. Cox, No. 05-7371,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Monroe v. Johnson, No. 05-7392,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A prisoner was not entitled to a COA in order to challenge the denial of his motion for reconsideration, construed as a successive 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 petition, because he failed to make the requisite substantial showing under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253(c)(2) of the denial of a constitutional right.
|
|||||
| Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home, No. 05-2399,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Moore v. Southtrust Corp., No. 05-1742,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Powell v. Wheeler, No. 05-7305,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rogers v. Unitrin Auto & Home Ins. Co., No. 05-2102,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Suter v. United States, No. 05-1521,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because FBI agent's undercover conduct - which allegedly assisted criminals by helping them to conceal and perpetuate investment fraud schemes - fell within the discretionary function exception of the FTCA, specifically 28 U.S.C.S. § 2680, the suit by the victims of the investment fraud scheme against the United States was barred.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
