 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Patterson, No. 04-4983,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because alternative sentence pronounced (in event federal sentencing guidelines were invalidated) was greater than mandatory sentence imposed under guidelines as they existed at time, any error resulting from sentence imposed was harmless as to defendant, and government waived any challenge by declining to file brief.
|
|||||
| United States v. Rathbone, No. 04-4062,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant waived his right to appeal his sentence because he stipulated to a lesser drug amount and final offense level in open court at sentencing and the district court confirmed his understanding of the stipulation and explicit waiver and sentenced him at the low end of the stipulated guideline range based on the lower amount.
|
|||||
| United States v. Simms, No. 05-4228,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mandatory minimum 15-year sentence of imprisonment imposed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(e) was affirmed. Court considered charge application, in which individual swore under oath defendant pistol whipped him, shot at him, and kicked him; material relied upon by court was proper because it was part of charging papers under Maryland law.
|
|||||
| United States v. Southern, No. 05-5012,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence of 320 months for attempted robbery, discharging firearm during an attempted robbery, and carjacking was reasonable. District court properly calculated the Guidelines range and appropriately treated the Guidelines as advisory. It sentenced defendant only after considering and examining the factors under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a).
|
|||||
| United States v. Surratt, No. 05-7051,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Williams, No. 05-7433,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Washington v. North Carolina, No. 05-7319,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
