 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Clark v. Langley, No. 05-7369,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hamm-Bey v. Johnson, No. 05-7729,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hampton v. Johnson, No. 05-7614,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hitter v. Pate, No. 05-7648,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mazuz v. Maryland, No. 05-1463,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of university detective's summary judgment motion was denied. Detective's mistake in entering wrong room and briefly detaining the detainee was understandable and search a reasonable response to situation facing detective at time, so detective's entry into detainee's room--i.e., the search--did not constitute Fourth Amendment violation.
|
|||||
| Murray v. Rudloff, No. 05-7637,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rosas-Zuloaga v. United States, No. 05-7686,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Smith v. Fahey, No. 05-7615, No. 05-7616, No. 05-7617,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Brookshire, No. 04-5097,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed as to the finding that he was a career criminal under the USSG, but the remainder of the sentence was vacated and remanded for resentencing since the district court considered facts extraneous to the conviction information contained in the presentence report to determine that the robberies were unrelated.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
