|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
5th Circuit Court of Appeals - January 4, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
H&H, LLC v. CWI-White Oaks Landfill, LLC, No. 05-30872 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Through its offer of extrinsic evidence at trial, seller conceded that royalty agreement with buyer was ambiguous. Thus, seller could not argue that agreement was unambiguous, so as to allow district court not to give deference to jury's interpretation of agreement limiting royalties to certain items and instead render judgment as matter of law.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
MJCM, L.L.C. v. United Cmty. Banks, Inc., No. 05-20465,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Finding that entity experienced change of control in ownership that would trigger § 11 of contract between plaintiff and entity was not error. Reading contract as whole termination under § 11 of contract did not bring § 12 of contract into play; in other words, § 11 contained own remedy, namely, payment of fees described in Exhibit C.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|