 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Bradshaw, No. 04-41035, No. 04-41110 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was unable to demonstrate that the district court violated his due process rights, codified in Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1, when it revoked his supervised release without proper notice, a hearing, or written findings because, although the district court may have erred in not following the requirements of Rule 32.1, any such error was harmless.
|
|||||
| United States v. Martinez-Melchor, No. 04-50301 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence of 63 months' imprisonment imposed upon defendant's conviction of illegal reentry after deportation was reasonable in light of factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) where district court explained it was departing upward because defendant had long criminal history, had previously been deported three times, and was likely to recidivate.
|
|||||
| United States v. Quevedo-Alvarez, No. 05-40403 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court lacked jurisdiction over defendant's claim. Because the district court erroneously advised defendant that he retained the right to appeal an illegal sentence, without defining what constituted an illegal sentence, the waiver was not made knowingly and voluntarily, and thus it did not bar the claim; however, the claim was not ripe for review.
|
|||||
| Zamora-Garcia v. Gonzales, No. 04-60255 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
