 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Deshotel, No. 06-40473 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 57-month sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon was affirmed as the district court properly addressed the 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors and, even if the district court erred by failing to provide adequate notice that it might deviate from the USSG, he failed to show that the error affected his substantial rights.
|
|||||
| United States v. Harris, No. 06-20145 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 57-month sentence for violating 26 U.S.C.S. § 7206(2) was affirmed because the amount of tax loss for purposes of the USSG did not have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, the district court did not err in calculating the tax loss, and defendant did not show clear error with respect to an enhancement for obstruction of justice.
|
|||||
| United States v. Juarez-Perez, No. 05-41589 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction was affirmed since, while it was assumed that the district court accepted the government's version of events as more credible, the record indicated that defendant had not raised the issue whether he voluntarily waived his right to counsel in the district court. The issue had been waived.
|
|||||
| United States v. Sherman, No. 05-10731 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 24-month sentence following revocation of his supervised release was affirmed because, while the sentence was in excess of the recommended range, the sentence was within the statutory maximum sentence that the district court could have imposed, and the district court considered the relevant sentencing factors.
|
|||||
| United States v. Woy, No. 05-11289 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's guilty plea conviction and 32-month sentence for violating 15 U.S.C.S. §§ 77q(a) and 77x were affirmed since the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because, inter alia, the government's opposition to a leadership enhancement fulfilled its obligation under the plea agreement.
|
|||||
| Watts v. Sch. Bd., No. 05-31156 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
