 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Confer v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., No. 06-60502 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer did not abuse its discretion in offsetting claimant's long-term disability payments, which were paid due to back injury, by LHWCA and Social Security awards, in accordance with "other income" provision in plan governed by ERISA, where both awards were intended to compensate claimant for the same back injury and related back problems.
|
|||||
| United States v. Elizondo, No. 06-10131,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's restitution for conspiracy to commit mail fraud was affirmed, but the sentence imposed on remand was vacated and remanded for resentencing again since the district court erred in not considering defendant's relevant conduct since the appellate court had remanded the original sentence for reconsideration in light of the Booker decision.
|
|||||
| United States v. Gentry, No. 06-30589 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 226-month non-USSG sentence for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 2113(a) and (d) was affirmed since the sentence was reasonable as the factors that the district court considered were proper, and defendant could not show that the lack of notice that the district court was considering a non-USSG sentence affected his substantial rights.
|
|||||
| United States v. Jurado, No. 06-50464 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Webber v. Jeter, No. 05-11296 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
