LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 5th Circuit Court of Appeals - January 26, 2007

  
Maknojia v. Gonzales, No. 05-60902 Summary Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
NLRB v. United States Postal Serv., No. 05-61168, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A federal appellate court enforced a cease-and-desist order by the NLRB against a postal service facility for repeated failures to respond to union information requests in violation of rights protected by the NLRA, 29 U.S.C.S. § 158(a), but modified the overly-broad order to tailor the remedy to specific acts the facility had actually committed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Terrebonne v. K-Sea Transp. Corp., No. 06-30041, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: An arbitration agreement was enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C.S. § 1, in a seaman's personal injury suit filed under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.S. § 688, because it was not subsumed into the seaman's employment contract; 28 U.S.C.S. § 1391(c)'s definition of "corporate residence" applied in Jones Act cases to determine venue.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Finley, No. 06-50160, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's conviction for one count of aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (methamphetamine) was affirmed because a lesser-included-offense instruction was not necessary; the two separate caches of drugs each constituted a separate violation of the narcotics laws.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Moore, No. 06-50596 Summary Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Record did not support defendant's claim that a district court mistakenly believed that a mandatory two-year minimum prison sentence was required under the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C.S. § 13, and Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04 and 49.09(b) upon defendant's guilty plea to DWI, so defendant's two-year sentence did not violate due process.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Roberts, No. 06-30588 Summary Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Trevino, No. 05-51309, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: District court did not err in admitting statement in which defendant, a former police officer, admitted to harassing women, in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 241; defendant was not faced with choice of making incriminating statement or being fired where there were no explicit or implicit threats that he would be fired if he did not make the statement.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.