LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 5th Circuit Court of Appeals - February 5, 2007

  
McBride v. Hilton, No. 06-30146 Summary Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A district court's dismissal of a pro se inmate's § 1983 complaint was affirmed since he did not object to a magistrate judge's recommendation that a sheriff's motion to dismiss and a deputy's summary judgment motion be granted, a second deputy did not use excessive, and Louisiana provided the inmate with due process for his property claim.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Herrera-Mendez, No. 06-50418 Summary Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Spells, No. 06-30431 Summary Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's conviction for violating 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a) and 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(c)(1) was affirmed because the district court correctly denied his motion to suppress since a DEA agent's reliance on a magistrate judge's ruling regarding the warrant affidavit was objectively reasonable, and thus in good faith. The good faith exception applied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.