 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bermudes-Cardenas v. Gonzales, No. 04-60574 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An alien's petition for review was denied because the BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying the alien's second motion to reopen on procedural grounds. The alien was not entitled to an EAJA award of attorney's fees and costs because he was not the prevailing party since his petition for review was denied.
|
|||||
| Skinner v. Lee, No. 04-30334 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Carmona-Calderon, No. 05-40026 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for violating 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326(a) and (b) was vacated, and the case was remanded since the government had not met its burden of proving that the district judge would have imposed the same sentence under an advisory USSG regime. But, his constitutional challenge to § 1326(b) was foreclosed by the Almendarez-Torres decision.
|
|||||
| United States v. Carrasco-Castro, No. 04-41713 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for violating 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326 was vacated, and the case was remanded because the government failed to show that the district court would have imposed the same sentence in a post-Booker environment. The challenge to the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326(b) was foreclosed by the Almendarez-Torres decision.
|
|||||
| United States v. Gilley, No. 03-10438,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 789-month sentence was affirmed because, even assuming arguendo that the first two prongs of the plain error test had been satisfied, there was no indication that the district court would have imposed a lesser sentence had it understood that the USSG were advisory.
|
|||||
| United States v. Youngblood, No. 04-50603 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
