 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Nail, No. 06-40356 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress because two sheriff's deputies had lawfully been on defendant's property under the open fields doctrine, a pistol was lawfully seized under the plain view doctrine, and the subsequent seizure of a holster and shell casing was also permissible under the plain view doctrine.
|
|||||
| United States v. Parsons, No. 06-60671 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) was affirmed because, inter alia, an agent's lack of personal knowledge of a weapon's manufacturer, model, and serial number during the pre-trial investigation was cured when the prosecutor handed him the firearm during his testimony.
|
|||||
| United States v. Reff, No. 06-50076,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for murder in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 1111 was affirmed because there was evidence to establish that the fatal wound actually occurred at an area that was considered to be part of a military reservation as required under 18 U.S.C.S. § 7. Instruction defining a government territory was not plain error.
|
|||||
| United States v. Rodriguez-Monge, No. 06-50447 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Simmons, No. 05-40704 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
