 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Hillsman, No. 06-20087,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction was affirmed since, even though the district court responded to a note from the jury without giving defense counsel a chance to object, there was no Sixth Amendment violation; it was not a critical stage and the district court's response was not materially different than that which both parties recommended.
|
|||||
| United States v. Kearns, No. 03-50198 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence imposed following revocation of defendant's supervised release was affirmed on appeal where defendant continued to violate terms of his release despite district court's leniency and warnings, sentence imposed was within applicable USSG range for each violation of supervised release, and the 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors were considered.
|
|||||
| United States v. McLymont, No. 06-40325 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 18-month sentence was affirmed since his appeal was subject to plain error review, and he could not overcome the confusion in the federal circuit courts regarding the lawfulness of the grouping instructions in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2J1.6 commentary to establish that the district court's error was clear and obvious.
|
|||||
| United States v. Meraz-Mejia, No. 06-50382 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Rhodes, No. 06-10189 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 180-month sentence for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 2241(c) was affirmed because the factors cited by the district court supported the non-USSG sentence and defendant could not show that the district court committed plain error by not giving him notice under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(h) that it would impose a non-USSG sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
