 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Maredia v. Gonzales, No. 04-60822 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied alien's petition for review of BIA order affirming denial of her request for asylum and withholding of removal; alien, a Muslim, failed to show that she would be singled out for persecution if she returned to India or that there was a pattern of discrimination against Muslims that she could not avoid by moving to another part of India.
|
|||||
| McAfee v. United States Dist. Court, No. 05-40942 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Nieto v. Reeves-Galloway, No. 04-21017 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Olivarez v. Petter, No. 04-41319 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) dismissal of a pro se inmate's § 1983 case was affirmed because, inter alia, a sheriff and a deputy captain were not liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for the actions of a jailer, and the Equal Protection Clause claim was meritless.
|
|||||
| Propes v. City Manager, No. 04-41267 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Propes v. Mays, No. 04-41498 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a prisoner had no liberty interest in the resolution of his grievance concerning the loss of property by prison officials overcharging for commissary purchases, the alleged failure to address his grievance did not constitute a violation of due process rights and his § 1983 claim was frivolous, as was the appeal of its dismissal.
|
|||||
| Puerta v. United States DOJ, No. 05-20154 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rehfuss v. City of Luling Police Dep't, No. 05-50515 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Risby v. United States, No. 05-10513 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
