 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Garcia-Gallegos, No. 05-40381 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Garcia-Hernandez, No. 05-40444 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Garcia-Herrera, No. 05-41058 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Garcia-Mejia, No. 04-41663 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Garcia-Nava, No. 05-40150 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence was affirmed, where defendant argued for first time on appeal that district court erred in imposing sentence under mandatory guidelines regime. Defendant conceded he could not establish reasonable probability that court likely would have sentenced him differently under advisory regime; therefore, he could not establish plain error.
|
|||||
| United States v. Garza-Garza, No. 04-41535 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence was affirmed, though district court's mandatory application of the sentencing guidelines constituted error that was plain. Defendant did not show error affected his substantial rights; nothing in record indicated that court would have sentenced defendant to a lesser sentence if it knew that the guidelines were merely advisory.
|
|||||
| United States v. Gomez-Romero, No. 04-41598 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Gonzalez-Guerra, No. 05-40862 Conference Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Gonzalez-Pardo, No. 04-41141 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a very brief order, the court affirmed in part but reversed in part defendant's sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326; without stating its analysis, the court held that the Government failed to show that the district court's Fanfan error did not affect defendant's sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
