 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Apache Bohai Corp. LDC v. Texaco China Bv, No 05-20413,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An arbitrator did not exceed his powers under 9 U.S.C.S. § 10(a)(4) by invalidating an exculpatory clause in an farm-in agreement executed by an oil company and two drilling companies because the agreement's arbitration clause was broadly-worded to cover "all disputes" including those arguably falling within the ambit of the exculpatory clause.
|
|||||
| Lemaire v. Louisiana, No. 05-31134,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the employer on the Title VII sexual harassment claim was reversed because the only argument raised in the employer's motion was to simply deny that the foreman made the allegedly offensive comments and include affidavits from other employees stating that the foreman never made inappropriate remarks to them.
|
|||||
| United States v. Landry, No. 06-30618 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Mata, No. 06-50486 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for violating 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841(a)(1) and 860 and 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 924(c)(1) and 922(g)(1) and (g)(3) was affirmed since the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1 enhancement, based on judicially determined facts, was not erroneous, and his sentence fell within the properly calculated USSG range.
|
|||||
| Zills v. Barnhart, No. 06-30877 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
