 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Sanchez-Navarro, No. 04-41521 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, March 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for violating 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326 was affirmed, but his sentence was vacated and remanded because the district court erroneously found that two Iowa convictions were aggravated felonies under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C), and the error substantially affected the fairness of the judicial proceedings.
|
|||||
| United States v. Segura-Lara, No. 04-20631 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, March 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court plainly erred when it precluded defendant's use of tobacco products because the prohibition against tobacco use was not reasonably related to defendant's crime of illegal reentry, and the prohibition involved a greater deprivation of liberty than was necessary to achieve deterrence and public safety under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3583(d).
|
|||||
| United States v. Vargas-Vasquez, No. 04-41619 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, March 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court did not abuse its discretion when it failed to order a competency hearing because defendant, during a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, responded lucidly, stated that he was in good mental health and had never been treated for any mental illness, and failed to offer prior medical opinions establish incompetency.
|
|||||
| United States v. Wilkins, No. 05-50705 Summary Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, March 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
