 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fuhrman v. Dretke, No. 05-50413,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, March 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's grant of an inmate's 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 petition was reversed, and judgment was rendered for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) as the grant was barred by the law of the case doctrine and the mandate rule, and the district court did not show deference to the TDCJ's interpretation of Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 411.148(d).
|
|||||
| In re Wilson, No. 04-41724,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, March 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's motion for authorization to file successive habeas petitions was time-barred by 28 U.S.C.S. § 2244. However, because the state two-forum rule forced the inmate into the untenable position of having to choose between two equally undesirable alternatives, the inmate's circumstances justified equitable tolling of the limitations period.
|
|||||
| Kaweesa v. Gonzales, No. 05-60364,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, March 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An alien's petition was dismissed as to her asylum claims because the court lacked jurisdiction since the BIA found those claims time barred. The petition was otherwise denied because the alien did not show that she was entitled to withholding of removal under either the INA or the CAT.
|
|||||
| United States v. Charon, No. 05-10360,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, March 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Viewing defendant's scheme to conceal or disguise his cocaine trafficking proceeds and impede the discovery of his offense in its entirety, the district court did not clearly err in finding that defendant's conduct constituted sophisticated laundering. The district court's application of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2S1.1(b)(3) was affirmed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
