 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barnes v. Bradley County Mem. Hosp., No. 04-6317,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the former employee resigned from his employment under circumstances which did not require payment of severance benefits by the terms of his agreement, the court would affirm the grant of summary judgment.
|
|||||
| United States v. Mitchell, No. 04-1892,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Officers' custodial interrogation violated Miranda; officers' statements that they were questioning defendants relative to drug trafficking investigation, their orders that defendants exit vehicle and questioning of defendants in separate locations, all suggested interrogation that a reasonable person would not have felt free to terminate.
|
|||||
| United States v. Robinson, No. 04-2522,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err in denying defendant's Fed. R. Crim. P. 29 motion to vacate his convictions for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute marijuana and for traveling in interstate commerce to promote the conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 1952; there was sufficient proof to establish defendant's guilt of conspiracies in two states.
|
|||||
| United States v. Wilder, No. 04-6255,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse discretion in denying defendant's Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(d) motion to withdraw guilty plea to charges under 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(c)(1)(A)(ii), 2119 where motion was filed more than one year after plea's entry. Judicial fact-finding involved in sentence under 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(e)(1) did not violate Sixth Amendment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
