LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 6th Circuit Court of Appeals - January 10 - January 12, 2007

  
Chirco v. Crosswinds Cmtys., Inc., No. 05-1715, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided , January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a copyright infringement action involving a condominium development, as suit was not filed until most units were built and many were occupied despite being aware of the project, the doctrine of laches was allowed to trump the three-year statute of limitations found in 17 U.S.C.S. § 507(b) insofar as developers sought destruction of the condos.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Clinton River Cruise Co. v. Delacruz, No. 05-2689, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A district court erred in refusing to consider affidavits offered by a ship company after depositions were taken when the affidavits provided a more complete explanation of a crewmember's duties and the parties disputed whether the crewmember's duties made her a deckhand because the affidavits were not contradictory to the deposition testimony.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Congrove v. McDonald's Corp. (In re Congrove), Nos. 05-4224, 05-4265, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Summary judgment for franchiser was proper in Chapter 11 debtor's action seeking to avoid transfer of franchises back to franchiser; there was "reasonably equivalent value" under 11 U.S.C.S. § 548(a)(1)(B) and Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §§ 1336.04, .05, and franchiser was not insider under 11 U.S.C.S. § 547(b)(4)(B) and Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 1336.05(B).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Griffith v. Coburn, No. 05-2720, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided , January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: District court erred in granting summary judgment based on qualified immunity in favor of police officer in personal representative's § 1983 action alleging excessive force during decedent's arrest in violation of U.S. Const. amend. IV; material dispute remained concerning reasonableness of officer's use of choke hold on person with mental problem.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hollins v. Methodist Healthcare, Inc., No. 05-6301, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided , January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Ministerial exception applied to employee's ADA claim given the pastoral role she filled at the hospital. Furthermore, employer did not waive its First Amendment right to the ministerial exception when it sought and obtained accreditation from the Association of Clinical Pastoral Education; therefore, the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Legair v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., Nos. 05-4179 & 06-3361, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Motion to compel arbitration and enforcement of arbitrator's decision was affirmed because the agreement to arbitrate was valid and enforceable and the employee failed to exercise his right to opt out of the program. Therefore, the employee, by his conduct, demonstrated his agreement to be bound by the employer's dispute resolution program.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Mburu v. Gonzales, Case No. 05-4041, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence supported denial of asylum under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(42)(A) based on finding that maltreatment of which alien wife complained did not constitute past persecution. Four-day detention, incidents of physical assault for which there was no showing that she sought medical attention, and interrogations did not amount to persecution.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Stewart v. Blackwell, No. 05-3044, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Tigrett v. United States, No. 05-6629, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Taxpayer was not entitled to a refund under 26 U.S.C.S. § 162 because his personal assumption and payment of a $ 5 million indemnity obligation to cover a corporate loss, which was unforeseeably occasioned in part by an act of domestic terrorism, was anything but "ordinary."

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Jackson, No. 05-6014, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Decided , January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of distribution and possession with intent to distribute more than five grams of crack cocaine, although he was arrested nearly 22 months after a grand jury handed down the indictment against him and the delay violated the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.S. § 3161(j), because there was no evidence of actual prejudice.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.