|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
6th Circuit Court of Appeals - January 10 - January 12, 2007
|
| |
Chirco v. Crosswinds Cmtys., Inc., No. 05-1715,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided , January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a copyright infringement action involving a condominium development, as suit was not filed until most units were built and many were occupied despite being aware of the project, the doctrine of laches was allowed to trump the three-year statute of limitations found in 17 U.S.C.S. § 507(b) insofar as developers sought destruction of the condos.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Hollins v. Methodist Healthcare, Inc., No. 05-6301,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided , January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Ministerial exception applied to employee's ADA claim given the pastoral role she filled at the hospital. Furthermore, employer did not waive its First Amendment right to the ministerial exception when it sought and obtained accreditation from the Association of Clinical Pastoral Education; therefore, the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Jackson, No. 05-6014,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Decided , January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of distribution and possession with intent to distribute more than five grams of crack cocaine, although he was arrested nearly 22 months after a grand jury handed down the indictment against him and the delay violated the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.S. § 3161(j), because there was no evidence of actual prejudice.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|