LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 6th Circuit Court of Appeals - February 1, 2006

  
Abu-Khaliel v. Gonzales, No. 04-4061, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2006, Decided , February 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Although 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(a)(2)(B) stripped court of jurisdiction to review denial of voluntary departure under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229c, court had jurisdiction to review IJ's denial of continuance because 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229a(a)(1) and 8 C.F.R. § 3.29 gave IJ statutory, not delegated, discretion over continuances; court found no abuse of discretion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Amptech, Inc. v. NLRB, Consolidated Case Nos. 04-2415, 04-2515, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: NLRB was entitled to enforcement of decision finding that employer violated NLRA, 29 U.S.C.S. §§ 141-169, because substantial evidence supported NLRB's findings that selection of permanent employees for layoff was motivated by their participation in union activities and that supervisor was discharged in retaliation for giving affidavit to NRLB.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bank of Montreal v. Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors (In re Am. Homepatient), Nos. 03-6500/6501, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Clark v. Chrysler Corp., No. 04-5279, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2006, Decided , February 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Punitive damage award of $ 3 million was reduced to $ 471, 258, or twice the compensatory damages award where the vehicle manufacturer's misconduct did not constitute a high degree of reprehensibility, the ratio of punitive to compensatory damages, 13 to 1, was unjustifiably large, and wide gap existed between award and civil penalties.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Holley v. Giles County, NO. 05-5760, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 suit, public employees' First Amendment retaliation claims failed because employees' speech--sending petition to sheriff regarding moisture problem in county building and filing personal injury suits against county and sheriff's department--was not a motivating factor in adverse actions, including terminations and reprimands.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Johnson v. Luoma, No. 04-1518, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Peck v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 05-5418, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Petition by a prevailing social security benefits claimant for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C.S. § 2412(d), was denied because the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the Government's position in denying benefits throughout the litigation was substantially justified.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Schilling v. Heavrin (In re Triple S Rests.), No. 04-5297, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Hooper, NO. 05-5436, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.