 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Fuson, No. 05-3782,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's downward "variance" from Sentencing Guidelines following guilty plea under 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g)(1) was not a Guideline-based departure but rather 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) non-Guideline departure; sentence of five years probation was not procedurally or substantively unreasonable because § 3553(a) factors were faithfully applied.
|
|||||
| United States v. Head, NO. 05-4061,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After detectives had elicited help from defendant to enter his residence and secure his pit bulls, not only was defendant detained as soon as practicable after leaving his residence, but the officers' performance in detaining him was reasonable to ensure the officers' safety and to effectuate a safe and efficient search of the residence.
|
|||||
| United States v. MPM Fin. Group, Inc., No. 06-5608,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under 26 U.S.C.S. § 6332(d)(1), the agency was liable as a matter of law for failing to honor the levy on a co-owner's wages because the notice of levy was mailed to the agency and was thus served in strict compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements and agency had to bear consequences of the co-owner's malfeasance.
|
|||||
| United States v. Owens, No. 05-5638,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Review of applicable Bashara factors established that defendant waited excessive amount of time to make his motion to withdraw, failed to provide valid reason, did not consistently maintain his innocence, and had extensive experience with criminal justice system. Therefore, there was no abuse of district court's discretion when it denied motion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
