 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Chrysler Corp. v. Comm'r, No. 03-1214,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: United States Tax Court judgment was affirmed because a taxpayer could not deduct anticipated warranty expenses on an accrual basis under 26 U.S.C.S. § 162, and the statute of limitations period of 26 U.S.C.S. § 6511(d)(3)(A) began with the date prescribed by law for filing the return for the year from which excess foreign taxes were carried.
|
|||||
| Kelly v. Senior Ctrs., Inc., Case No. 04-4094,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment to an employer and supervisors on an employee's hostile work environment claim was affirmed as he failed to raise a genuine issue of disputed fact that the environment unreasonably interfered with his ability to work. However, summary judgment was reversed as to his retaliatory discharge claim as he presented evidence of pretext.
|
|||||
| Mackie v. Gonzales, No. 04-3726,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported denial of asylum based on adverse credibility finding where alien's two asylum applications were completely different. First application claimed alien was from non-black background and was never accepted while second application stated life was in danger because he came from wealthy and politically connected family.
|
|||||
| Marji v. Gonzales, No. 04-4536,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under former 8 U.S.C.S. § 1254, a decision denying voluntary departure was a discretionary one. The court thus had jurisdiction to review the immigration judge's decision only for underlying claims of legal or constitutional error, and as the alien made no such claims, the denial of his request for voluntary departure was affirmed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Foreman, No. 04-2450,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a prosecution for possession of a firearm by a felon, a district court erred in qualifying defendant's previous crime of fleeing and eluding in the fourth degree as a "crime of violence" for purposes of USSG § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) because the district court improperly found that the "categorical" approach to resolving the issue was determinative .
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
